THE ROMANIZED CHRIST
Saved From Being Born
The dogma of Christianity doesn't just rest upon flawed and contradicting Gospels, but is completely dependent upon the credibility of Genesis and its fabricated interpretation of the "curse" in Genesis. For the "curse" in Genesis falsely claims that all of humanity has been sold into sin. Stating that everyone must accept its Jewish savior as Lord and Savior, or its Romanized Christ will cast them that reject him into the endless fires of a burning hell to suffer unspeakable eternal torment. With a savior like this, does one really need a devil to fear?
The "curse" in Genesis, exactly what does it say: The Genesis Curse
Lead us not into Temptation
What kind of a deity leads one into temptation? Certainly not God! Telling people they should pray that God would not lead them into temptation truly reflects an obvious ignorance of the goodness of God. I do not know whether or not the Biblical Jesus was a real person or not, but when considering his alleged words, it is clear that he was not seeking to establish a religion that was inclusive of all, but was a reformer of Judaism. Had he been seeking to establish a new and inclusive religion, he certainly wouldn't have referred to the Gentiles as dogs, which in that backward region was and is the ultimate insult. More importantly, had he been what the self-called proclaim of him, not only would he have known that the likes of 1 Samuel 15: 2-3 is falsely said of God, but surely would have said so. Yet he remains silent on this matter, as well as with other outrageous claims that the Pentateuch makes against the goodness of God. His silence on these matters speaks volumes as to what Jesus really was, a pious Jew. And because he was a pious Jew, he was made blind to the faults of the Pentateuch, and thus he believed abominable things about God himself.
The Fix was In: The Romanized Christ
In spite of its crimes in the past, most Christians tend to think that the Christian Church was founded through gentle persuasion and with sound argument; that their religion has always been the paddy-cake social club that it is for the most part today. Nothing could be further from the truth. The coinage used to establish Christianity throughout the Roman Empire was terror and coercion. The penalty to question the legitimacy of Rome's new demigod, the Romanized Christ, brought swift reprisals to anyone that questioned, either through persecution, torture or murder.
Were it not for the assistance of a murderous Roman Emperor, Christianity would have remained but a small Jewish sect and one of the many minor religions of the Roman Empire. Yet Constantine, the Emperor of Rome, was in need of a system that would assist him in maintaining his control over an empire that was being threatened from within and without. Constantine shrewdly recognized that an empire composed of diverse peoples could be more easily controlled if they shared a common religion. The religion that Constantine was in need of would have to be a religion that was intolerant of other religions, and Christianity being a most intolerant religion, fit the bill. The fix was in with the blessing of Constantine. An ambitious Christian priesthood was allowed to rid themselves of their competitors in exchange for their support of Roman authority.
Even if a Christian is unaware of Constantine's involvement in the establishment of Christianity, they certainly can't plead being ignorant about the bloody history of the Roman Church and the wickedness of its earlier popes. For these things are a matter of historical record. It is a mockery of the Omniscience of God to think that God would use the point of a Roman sword to build His House, or would have laid its foundation upon the innocent blood of multitudes. As for those little houses of rebellion of the Roman Church, there is nothing for them to gloat about, for the founders of Protestantism, Luther and Calvin, were as loony and wicked as any pope of Rome.
The Religion of the Romanized Christ
Christianity, the religion of the Romanized Christ, is an Abrahamic House of Bondage. For a religion whose teachings about God that can so pervert the mind of its believers into thinking "Amazing Grace" is an appropriate hymn for the funeral of a child is truly a House of Bondage and surely is the Spiritual Land of Egypt.
Christianity is a self-condemning religion, whose chains of bondage bind more tightly than the chains of Judaism. For where Judaism is a religion of judging the outward things of the flesh, Christianity is a religion that judges the inward things of the mind. And where Jews can perform rituals to absolve themselves of a transgression, rituals can not erase the thoughts of Christians. And in being perpetually caused to judge their every thought, many Christians are driven into insanity and fill our mental wards.
Christianity is a faith born of fear of unbelief, rather than love of God, love of Jesus, or love of what is believed. It is a faith dependent upon one's self-loathing, passive ignorance, and an unrighteous fear of God. It is a faith that discourages truthfulness before God, with self and with others; for Christianity it is upheld by its demand of an unquestioning faith, with the threat of damnation to question what it claims. It is a religion that requires one to accept beliefs of God that are contrary to one's own sense of what is righteous. It is a religion that is more suitable for the dishonest than the honest, for it makes a liar of all. No rationally minded person truthfully believes that were it not for the crucifixion of Jesus, they are deserving of being cast into a fiery hell and eternally tormented. And no sound minded sane person is capable of loving a bloody butcher who would command the slaughter of defeated people - including the butchery of women, children and infants. For any child of God claiming to believe that what the bloody one of 1 Samuel 15:2-3 commanded men to do is good is making a liar of himself before God and men.
1 Samuel 15:2-3
Voltaire: "Those who can induce you to believe absurdities can induce you to commit atrocities"
1 Samuel 15:2-3Thus says the Lord of hosts,.. (3) Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camels and donkey!
Surely one can't believe that they are more righteous than God is? So how is it that many who claim to believe 1 Samuel 15:2-3 is truthfully said of God, find that what God commands men to do is contrary to their own sense of what is righteous? 1 Samuel 15:2-3 perfectly illustrates a belief of God, that any sane person should find repugnant to their own sense of what is righteous. There is no difference, whatsoever, in the vileness that was done by the Islamist terrorists on 9/11 and the vileness that is done in 1 Samuel 15:2-3. Both are manifestations of insane beliefs of God. For the Hitlerian like commands in 1 Samuel 15:2-3 reflects not the mind of God, but a depraved mind.
Only a moron or a lunatic would think that butchering people is not an atrocity. How can any sound-minded person not see the utter insanity of believing God would command men to be the butchers of defeated men and women, which by itself is vile enough, but that God even commanded that the children and infants be butchered as well? To believe such a perverse claim about God leaves little need of having a devil to fear. Common sense alone should tell you that had God wanted to destroy the Amalekites, He would have done it Himself!
For unlike the primitive mumbo jumbo in the accounts of the Great flood and the slaying of the firstborn of Egypt, where God is said to do the dirty work, 1 Samuel 15:2-3 has God commanding men to do the dirty work. Thus, it can be personalized by anyone who will simply imagine one's self in that scenario. By making it personal, one must visualize the horror of that bloody scene. See the sword in their hand and the terror in the eyes of those whom they are being told to butcher. Hear the screams of women and children that are being literally hacked to death in front of one another. Only by making this atrocity personal does it become real, no longer just some ancient abstract account. It should force one to consider whether or not they could have been obedient to the claims of priests: It's God's command! And to honestly question whether or not they could love one that would command them to do such horrible things.
To try and rationalize what is commanded in 1 Samuel 15:2-3 requires the same kind of perverted belief of God that Islamic terrorists are using today to justify the evil that they do. For much is revealed about the mentality and spirituality of those who instruct others to believe that the men who were ripping terrified children from their mother's arms and bashing their brains out were righteous before God, for God commanded this butchery.
No child of God can truthfully say that what 1 Samuel 15:2-3 is claiming of God has not troubled them. The only excuse they can offer is that they believe it because they are fearful of not believing it. Which is the evidence of their bondage to an unrighteous fear of God, the cornerstone that upholds the Abrahamic House of Bondage.
Martin Luther: "If men only believe enough in Christ they can commit adultery and murder a thousand times a day without periling their salvation."
It is this kind of loony thinking that best describes the inherent insanity that is sown through the demand of an unquestioning faith in whatsoever the New Testament claims; a mindless faith that did loose great evils in the name of God.
Martin Luther's loony theology: The Deranged Theologian
To claim that the New Testament bears no responsibility for sowing the seeds of the Holocaust is hogwash. With what the New Testament hatefully says of the Jews, coupled with Luther's maniacal ravings against the Jews, an intense hatred of Jews was sown throughout Christendom long before the days of Hitler.
Luther's rantings against the Jews: Seeds of the Holocaust
Jesus speaking to the Jews:
John 8:44"You are from your father the devil, and you choose to do your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies."
Jews and the crucifixion of Jesus:
Matthew 27:22Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified. & 27:25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
Paul speaking about the Jews:
1 Thessalonians 2:14-16"For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: (15) Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: (16) Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost."
What should be done with people who please not God, are contrary to all men and whose father is the devil? If one chooses of their own freewill to believe that the likes of 1 Samuel 15:2-3 speaks truthfully of God, it's just a small step from that insane belief to believing that those described in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 and John 8:44 are deserving of the same fate as the Amelekites. For those whom it does not trouble to believe that God would command men to be butchers of people, would also believe that the likes of 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 and John 8:44 are not just the words of men, but God's!
Adolf Hitler: "I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews I am fighting for the Lord's work." In a speech to the Reichstag (1936).
Trying to claim that the of the likes of 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 and John 8:44 were not intended to be understood as condemning all Jews does not float, for this is exactly how these perversions have been used! It is intellectually dishonest to claim that they are referring to just a small faction of the Jews, the Pharisees. The Pharisees were the most numerous and influential of the religious sects in the days of Jesus. Simply change Pharisees to Orthodox Jew and that would represent a Pharisee today. There is no way around it. 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 and John 8:44 were in reference to Jews that rejected Jesus as their Messiah, and therefore they can be used to persecute any Jew that does not accept the Messiah.
See a Jewish view of 1 Samuel 15:2-3: I am an Israelite!
In much the same way that pandering politicians and the loony PC crowd today are denying that there is a direct link between Islamic terrorism and the Koran, Christians do the very the same by claiming that Hitler alone is responsible for the Holocaust. When the truth is, had the German people not been first predisposed to hate the Jews, having been seduced by the anti-Semitism in the New Testament and Luther's ranting against the Jews, the evil Hitler was preaching against the Jews would have had been ineffectual.
I suppose that those that will claim that Hitler was not a Christian would also claim that neither were the popes. Nevertheless, Hitler was a baptized Roman Catholic that was not excommunicated by the Roman Church for preaching hatred of the Jews. And he justified his hatred of the Jews by using anti-Jewish claims in the New Testament and invoking God's name.
See the religious views of Hitler: The Religion of Hitler
Does God not weigh and measure His words more carefully than a man would his? Does God not know the effect of what He says? Does God not know how to inspire one to phrase a statement in such a way that it could not and would not be misinterpreted by men to do evil? Were it not for bondage to an unrighteous fear of God, many would have known better than to confuse words of men with that of God's. For whatsoever God sows is good, not evil. For in foreknowing the effect of His words, God would not inspire anything that could and would be used to justify evil, which the likes of John 8:44 and 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 most certainly did.
Were it not for bondage to an unrighteous fear of God, one would know how to separate the Biblical wheat from its tares, to distinguish between what is an absurd claim in the Bible from what is sound advice. They would not be fearful of using the good sense that God blessed them with to be able to discern the difference between what is primitive mumbo-jumbo from what is good advice. Finding truth in the Bible is simply a matter of separating what rings true within the Spiritual heart from that which does not. It is not a matter of hearing a heavenly choir sing its approval. For dung is dung regardless of where it is found; and if one has not crucified their mind and has any common sense at all, then surely they should be able to tell which of the following claims in the Bible is but mumbo-jumbo and which is sound advice? Shouldn't they?
John 5:2Now there is at Jerusalem by the sheep market a pool, which is called in the Hebrew tongue Bethesda, having five porches. 3 In these lay a great multitude of impotent folk, of blind, halt, withered, waiting for the moving of the water. 4 For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.
Philippians 4:8 "Finally brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there is any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things".
Faith in God and faith in what the Bible says of God is not one and the same.
No doubt the religiously minded will reject what I'm saying about 1 Samuel 15:2-3 and God, not because they like what it says of God, but because their vanity will not allow them to admit that they were deceived by its claims in the first place. And there will be others who will assume that had God wanted someone to speak out in defense of God on this matter, surely He would have asked them first.
Nevertheless, those who do read my report will no longer have the excuse of never having heard one argue against what 1 Samuel 15:2-3 does perversely claim of God. For not one of you can stand before God or man and truthfully testify that God himself did personally tell you that 1 Samuel 15:2-3 is truthfully said of Him. The only excuse you have now for your belief that God is that bloody butcher in1 Samuel 15:2-3, is that you choose to believe it because you are too fearful to think for yourself, which is the evidence of your bondage to an unrighteous fear of God.
Examples of contradictions and absurdities from the Bible
Old Testament: The Land of Spiritual Egypt
The Gospels:Abrahamic House of Bondage
Return to the writings of Wayne Lamar Harrington
Return to:HARRINGTON SITES
Revealing the Spiritual duality of the Bible. For it serves neither God nor truth to try and rationalize irrational things the Bible has said of God.